Next: Figure 2 Up: Figure and Table Previous: Figure and Table

Figure 1

Figure 1.

An example of a useful `loose' similarity between 3D structure detected using the MAP method and a secondary structure prediction. a) The alignment found by the method between the predicted pattern for HNF-3 and the helical DNA binding motif within phage 434 repressor. Boxed, bold-faced, upper-case regions indicate aligned predicted and experimental secondary structures. Sec denotes the PHD prediction for HNF-3, and a 3-state DSSP secondary structure assignment for 434 repressor. Bur shows predicted and experimental states of burial for HNF-3 and 434 repressor: b = buried, e = exposed; u = intermediate/unknown. b) The equivalent alignment found using the STAMP (Russell &Barton, 1992) structure comparison algorithm. Boxed, bold-faced, upper-case regions indicate structural equivalences. Sec denotes DSSP 3-state secondary structures for both proteins. c) and d) show the crystallographic structures of the matched regions of HNF-3 and 434 repressor, with structurally equivalent residues shown in ribbon/coil format, and unequivalent regions shown as trace. The N- and C- termini of the structures are labelled.


gjb@bioch.ox.ac.uk